Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 vs Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

49

Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Great battery life
Battery life
540 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS

Macro focus
Great macro
0.0 cm
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX10 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$469 - $498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$274 - $298

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Super zoom

$438 - $448

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Zoom Significantly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX10 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$363 - $479

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Much more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$322

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Super zoom

$420

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Lumix DMC-FZ200
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX10 IS
PowerShot SX10 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments