Updated (September, 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Olympus XZ-1

vs

Olympus XZ-1

48

Olympus XZ-1

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S95

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-1

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Battery life
Great battery life
320 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon S95

Report a correction
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality 47.0 vs 34.0
Help
Around 40% better image quality
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Dynamic range More dynamic range 11.3 EV vs 10.4 EV
Help
0.9 f-stops more dynamic range
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Color depth Better color depth 20.4 bits vs 18.8 bits
Help
Distinguishes 1.6 more bits of color
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO 153 ISO vs 117 ISO
Help
The S95 has a slight edge (0.4 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO 12,800 ISO vs None
Help
Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image
Size Smaller 99x58x29 mm vs 110x64x42 mm
Help
More than 40% smaller
Weight Lighter 193 g vs 275 g
Help
Around 30% lighter
Thickness Thinner 1.2" vs 1.7"
Help
More than 30% thinner
Canon PowerShot S95 Learn more about
the Canon S95

Advantages of the Olympus XZ-1

Report a correction
Screen type Has an OLED screen OLED vs LCD
Help
OLED screens are often brighter and more vibrant than typical LCD screens
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Sensor size Larger sensor 1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm vs 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
Help
Around 20% larger sensor
Aperture Wider aperture f/1.8 vs f/2.0
Help
At its widest zoom, the XZ-1's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Macro focus Significantly better macro capability 1 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 5x closer to the lens
Battery life Significantly longer battery life 320 shots vs 200 shots
Help
60% more shots per battery charge
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 614k dots vs 461k dots
Help
More than 30% higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The XZ-1's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 7 fps vs 1.9 fps
Help
More than 3.5x faster continuous shooting
External flash Supports an external flash Yes vs No
Help
An external flash often produces better looking flash images
Longest exposure Longer exposures 60s vs 15s
Help
4x longer exposures
Lowest price Cheaper $228.99 vs $309.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $80 cheaper (around 30% less)
Olympus XZ-1 Learn more about
the Olympus XZ-1
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent pro digicams, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot S95 Canon PowerShot S95 54
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        48 Olympus XZ-1 Olympus XZ-1
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Aperture Very wide aperture Help
              S95:f/2.0
              XZ-1:f/1.8
              Supports RAW RAW support Help
              Better editing
              Sensor size Large sensors Help
              S95:1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
              XZ-1:1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Dynamic range Poor dynamic range Help
              S95:11.3 EV
              XZ-1:10.4 EV
              Low light performance Above average noise at high ISO Help
              S95:153 ISO
              XZ-1:117 ISO
              Color depth Poor color depth Help
              S95:20.4 bits
              XZ-1:18.8 bits
              Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
              28 mm
              Movie format HD (720p) video Help
              S95:720p @ 24fps
              XZ-1:720p @ 30fps
              Overall image quality Low image quality Help
              S95:47.0
              XZ-1:34.0
              High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
              Not supported
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              S95:3.8x
              XZ-1:4x

              Compared to recent pro digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Lowest price Inexpensive Help
              S95:$309.00
              XZ-1:$228.99
              Light sensitivity (boost) One has boost ISO Help
              S95:12,800 ISO
              XZ-1:None
              True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
              10 MP
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              S95:3,200 ISO
              XZ-1:6,400 ISO
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              S95:1.9 fps
              XZ-1:7 fps
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              S95:461k dots
              XZ-1:614k dots

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot S110

              Canon PowerShot S110

              Pro digicam

              $230 - $249

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon PowerShot S120

              Canon PowerShot S120

              Pro digicam

              $449 - $451

              Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Canon Powershot S100

              Canon Powershot S100

              Pro digicam

              $305 - $429

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Pro digicam

              $498

              Sensor size Has a much larger sensor
              Low light performance Is significantly less noisy at high ISO
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

              Pro digicam

              $599

              Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
              Shutter lag Has much less shutter lag
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Canon PowerShot S90

              Canon PowerShot S90

              Pro digicam

              Shutter lag Has much less shutter lag
              Movie format Records lower quality movies
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

              Pro digicam

              $331 - $348

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker

              Canon PowerShot S95 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot S200

              Canon PowerShot S200

              Pro digicam

              $232

              Wide angle Better wide angle
              Aperture Wider aperture

              Olympus XZ-1 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Pro digicam

              $299 - $599

              Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Sensor size Smaller sensor
              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Pro digicam

              $175 - $399

              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Sensor size Significantly smaller sensor
              Fujifilm Finepix X10

              Fujifilm Finepix X10

              Pro digicam

              $323 - $591

              Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
              Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Screen size Smaller screen

              appearance

              Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus XZ-1
              Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus XZ-1
              Canon PowerShot S95 Olympus XZ-1

              discussion

              Canon PowerShot S95
              PowerShot S95
              Canon

              Report a correction
              Olympus XZ-1
              XZ-1
              Olympus

              Report a correction

              Showing 9 comments

              Mike (6:51 PM, March 06, 2012)
              I own and use both cameras. This is very odd advice. To address the low light issue first: The Olympus has a lens which is much faster, so the fact that the Canon has a sensor/processing engine about 1/3 stop less noisy is in no way going to lead to it having better low light ability (although the Olympus has a badly-designed exposure meter and requires between 1 and 2 stops of exposure compensation to be dialled in in low light). The Olympus lens is also optically slightly better than the Canon's in terms of corner sharpness, so if you know how to use it, is capable of slightly better image quality than the Canon. 
               
              felipe (1:39 AM, February 14, 2012)
              The canon feels like a toy camera, I had it for 2 weeks and took hundreds of pic. the image quality is very good but the olympus pic are great! I willl keep the olympus because is a lot more camera in any subject, the lens are incredible fast, 1.8f and 2.5f at max zoom, as far a low light situations the olympus is the king the canon shows more noise. 
               
              Niunalias (9:00 AM, January 11, 2012)
              I will pot to you whatewer you want that I will take better photos in low light with my xz-1 than you with your S95. (I have both cameras) and I can say to you that now I can shoot at 100-200 iso in practically all situations, raising to 400 in a candel situations, with the S95 I must raise till 800 to 1600. Iso 400 is fairy better than canon iso 800 not to mention iso 200 at xz-1.
              This page is Canon powered ?
               
              Guest (6:25 PM, December 04, 2011)
              The Test is not fair at all.
              For example: "At its widest zoom, the XZ-1's lens captures marginally more light (0,3 f-stops)"... noone is bothering about the wide end... as soon as u zoom in a bit, u got far smaller aperture at s95. You could write, that XZ-1 is only 0.5 f-stops slower at tele then Canon at the wide end. Sounds different, doesn't it?
              And by the way: If snapsort cites dpreview.com, so please don't forget to mention, that S95 reached a score of 72% there (really good result, Silver Award) but the XZ-1 was even better with 74% (Gold Award)
              The only real advantage of the canon is its smaller size.
               
              Dexterus (7:16 PM, August 29, 2011)
              yeah.. "should" Especially with it's dark F4.9 at longer end.
               
              Charlie (2:10 PM, August 17, 2011)
              I have had both and I sold the S95 because I like the colors that come out of the XZ-1 better. There's not much difference when it comes to handling the two - it's just a matter of getting used to your tool. I hate Photoshop so therefor the XZ-1 was the perfect choice for me. I just open the RAW file in Olympus Viewer 2 and save them as jpg's. Sometimes - if I've made a blunder - I change the white balance before I convert the file - thats all :) With the S95 there was always something I did not like and had to adjust :( You should try them both to see for yourself....
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (1:42 PM, May 06, 2011)
              Snapsort recommends the Canon S95 because it has better image quality, it should take better photos in low light situations, it's smaller, lighter and cheaper.
              Good luck in your search.
               
              Nishith (1:22 PM, May 06, 2011)
              i am considering Cannon S95 or Olympus xz-1. Can anyone advise which is better?
               
              Eliedata (0:12 PM, February 05, 2011)
              The XZ-1 sensor is 1/1.63" (not 1/1.7").