Canon PowerShot G12 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Winner
Canon PowerShot G12

49

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

28

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G12

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Great macro
Macro focus
1.0 cm
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10

Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G12.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G12 Competitors

Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$399 - $417

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$413

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Canon PowerShot G11

Canon PowerShot G11

Pro digicam

$479

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Startup delay Less startup delay
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$602 body only

$598 - $650 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Slightly heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$381 body only

3D Takes 3D photos
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Color depth Worse color depth
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$433 body only

$560 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen

discussion

Canon PowerShot G12
PowerShot G12
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G10
Lumix DMC-G10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments