Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Canon PowerShot G12 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Winner
Placeholder

41

Placeholder

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G12

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Tunnel
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
25 mm
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
12 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G12.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.

competitors

Canon PowerShot G12 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$679

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$1,299

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$1,606

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$368 - $370

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Placeholder

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Placeholder
PowerShot G12
Canon

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments