Updated (August 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot G12 vs Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700 vs Canon PowerShot G12

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P7700

46

Canon PowerShot G12

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7700

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot G12

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot G12.
Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7700.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7700 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pro digicam

$420

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900

Travel zoom

$397

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$325 - $379

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Much narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot G12 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Travel zoom

$349

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports RAW No RAW support
Canon PowerShot G16

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$417 - $499

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G15

Canon PowerShot G15

Pro digicam

$439

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P7700
Coolpix P7700
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot G12
PowerShot G12
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments