Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot D10 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Canon PowerShot D10

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

84

Canon PowerShot D10

76

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot D10

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/5000 of a second
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Waterproof
Waterproof
Great at the beach

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot D10.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$83 - $120

Aperture Wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

Waterproof

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Travel zoom

$118 - $130

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot D10 Competitors

Canon EOS 7D

Canon EOS 7D

Pro DSLR

$849 body only

$1,119 with 18-200mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Ricoh WG-4

Ricoh WG-4

Waterproof

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Waterproof

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot D10
PowerShot D10
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments