Updated (August 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot D10 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Canon PowerShot D10

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

71

Canon PowerShot D10

64

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot D10

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/5000 of a second
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot D10.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$83 - $109

Aperture Wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$264 - $347

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$134 - $138

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot D10 Competitors

Canon PowerShot D30

Canon PowerShot D30

Waterproof

$245 - $299

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot D20

Canon PowerShot D20

Waterproof

$550

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$489 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Much larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot D10
PowerShot D10
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments