Canon Rebel T2i vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

Winner
Canon EOS Rebel T2i

112

Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

80

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T2i

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 30fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,040k dots
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

Color depth
Great color depth
22.4 bits
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
199 ms shutter lag
Storage slots
More storage slots
2

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Rebel T2i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha DSLR-A330.

competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T2i Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$325 body only

$350 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$497 body only

$460 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$431 - $649 body only

$535 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Autofocus Video autofocus
Color depth Worse color depth

Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 Competitors

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100

Entry-level DSLR

$574 with 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon EOS 40D

Canon EOS 40D

Pro DSLR

$1,199 body only

$1,874 with 28-135mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Canon EOS 5D

Canon EOS 5D

Pro DSLR

$2,300 body only

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Live view No live view

discussion

Canon EOS Rebel T2i
Rebel T2i
Canon

Report a correction
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments