Updated (August 2010): Compare the Canon EOS Rebel T1i vs Sony SLT-A33

Sony SLT A33 vs Canon Rebel T1i

Winner
Sony SLT-A33

107

Canon EOS Rebel T1i

100

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A33

Great image quality
Overall image quality
70.0
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 30fps
Great color depth
Color depth
22.8 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
12.6 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T1i

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentamirror
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
159 ms shutter lag
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Rebel T1i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A33.

competitors

Sony SLT-A33 Competitors

Sony SLT A58

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

$944 with 10-24mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha DSLR-A390

Sony Alpha DSLR-A390

Entry-level DSLR

$812 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
Battery life Longer battery life
Movie format Does not take movies
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$190

Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Much smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies

Canon EOS Rebel T1i Competitors

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$479 body only

$380 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$349 body only

$550 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$499 body only

$752 with 18-135mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Much larger

discussion

Sony SLT-A33
SLT A33
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS Rebel T1i
Rebel T1i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments