Nikon D5300 vs Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Winner
Nikon D5300

100

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D5300

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,037k dots
High true resolution
True resolution
24 MP
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (127×94×65 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.6"
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed

galleries

Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D5300.

competitors

Nikon D5300 Competitors

Nikon D5600

Nikon D5600

Entry-level DSLR

$468 - $597 body only

$500 - $647 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$309 body only

$395 - $397 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500

Entry-level DSLR

$475 body only

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Smaller
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi Competitors

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$309 body only

$395 - $397 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Significantly larger
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$473 body only

$399 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Significantly larger
Nikon D3000

Nikon D3000

Entry-level DSLR

$637 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

discussion

Nikon D5300
D5300
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments