Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 vs Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Winner
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230

84

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

78

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha DSLR-A230

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
600 ms startup delay
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
194 ms shutter lag
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Live view
Has live view
Preview your photos
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (126×98×65 mm)
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Thickness
Thin
2.6"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha DSLR-A230.

competitors

Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 Competitors

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100

Entry-level DSLR

$350 body only

$649 with 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$640 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

Entry-level DSLR

Live view Has live view
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS Competitors

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$626 body only

$380 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$317 - $649 body only

$376 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Significantly larger
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Entry-level DSLR

$900 with 18-55mm lens

Size Slightly smaller
Live view No live view

discussion

Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Alpha DSLR-A230
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS
EOS Digital Rebel XS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments