Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS vs Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Winner
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

78

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

71

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
719 ISO
Has live view
Live view
Preview your photos
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
300 ms startup delay
Great color depth
Color depth
22 bits
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (127×94×65 mm)
Color depth
Great color depth
22.1 bits
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
200 ms shutter lag
Thickness
Thin
2.6"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS.
Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi.

competitors

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS Competitors

Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$479 body only

$380 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$499 body only

$752 with 18-135mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Canon EOS Rebel T1i

Canon Rebel T1i

Entry-level DSLR

$500 body only

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$349 body only

$550 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Much larger
Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$479 body only

$380 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Live view Has live view
Size Much larger
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi

Entry-level DSLR

$650 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Live view Has live view

discussion

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS
EOS Digital Rebel XS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments