Sony SLT A65 vs Canon EOS 7D

Winner
Sony SLT-A65

100

Canon EOS 7D

94

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A65

Great image quality
Overall image quality
74.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.4 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
12.6 EV
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.71x
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 7D

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
400 ms startup delay
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism
Thickness
Thin
2.9"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 43 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 7D.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A65.

competitors

Sony SLT-A65 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$469 body only

$749 - $798 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$307 - $649 body only

$355 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has an optical viewfinder
Lens availability Significantly more lenses available
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Sony SLT-A77

Sony SLT A77

Pro DSLR

$1,531 body only

$1,499 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Larger

Canon EOS 7D Competitors

Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$799 body only

$829 - $999 with 18-55mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Viewfinder size Slightly smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$999 - $1,299 body only

$1,699 with 24-105mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Color depth Better color depth
Lens availability Fewer lenses available
Canon EOS 60D

Canon EOS 60D

Pro DSLR

$790 body only

$1,499 with 18-200mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing

discussion

Sony SLT-A65
SLT A65
Sony

Report a correction
Canon EOS 7D
EOS 7D
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments