Canon EOS 7D vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon EOS 7D

46

Samsung NX200

34

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 7D

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
131 ms shutter lag
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
220 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Thickness
Thin
1.4"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 43 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 7D.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon EOS 7D Competitors

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$949 - $999 body only

$1,399 - $1,999 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Longer battery life
Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$649 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$919 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder coverage Less viewfinder coverage

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Olympus PEN E-P3

Olympus PEN E-P3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Startup delay Much less startup delay
True resolution Lower true resolution
Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX100

Samsung NX100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$300 body only

$486 with 20-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Canon EOS 7D
EOS 7D
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments