Canon EOS 7D vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon EOS 7D

50

Samsung NX200

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 7D

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
12.6 EV
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 43 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 7D.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon EOS 7D Competitors

Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$723 - $799 body only

$829 - $899 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder coverage Less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$1,178 - $1,399 body only

$1,799 with 24-105mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Viewfinder coverage Significantly less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Pro DSLR

$1,135 - $1,499 body only

$1,421 - $1,849 with 18-135mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Shutter lag More shutter lag

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$450

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX1000

Samsung NX1000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$440 with 20-50mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$663 body only

$730 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Startup delay Much less startup delay
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Canon EOS 7D
EOS 7D
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments