Canon EOS 7D vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon EOS 7D

45

Samsung NX200

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 7D

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
400 ms startup delay
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Many cross-type focus points
Cross type focus points
19
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
12.6 EV
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 43 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 7D.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon EOS 7D Competitors

Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$724 - $899 body only

$850 - $999 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Viewfinder coverage Less viewfinder coverage
Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$1,145 - $1,499 body only

$1,722 - $1,899 with 24-105mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Cross type focus points Many fewer cross-type focus points
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Pro DSLR

$1,149 - $1,499 body only

$1,448 - $1,849 with 18-135mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Autofocus Video autofocus
Shutter lag More shutter lag

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Samsung NX1000

Samsung NX1000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$175 with 20-50mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$689 body only

$591 with 18-55mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Slightly larger
Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$470 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

discussion

Canon EOS 7D
EOS 7D
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments