|
|
 |
Canon EOS 60D
Pro DSLR
$649 - $968 body only $949 - $1,182 with 18-135mm lens
|
|
 |
Has a slightly higher resolution screen |
 |
Has a screen which flips out |
|
|
 |
Is thicker |
 |
Is slightly larger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Canon EOS 6D
Pro DSLR
$1,899 - $1,917 body only $2,399 with 24-105mm lens
|
|
 |
Is significantly less noisy at high ISO |
 |
Has a slightly higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
Has a slower max shutter speed |
 |
Doesn't have a built-in flash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Nikon D7000
Entry-level DSLR
$897 body only $997 with 18-105mm lens
|
|
 |
Can focus continuously while recording movies |
 |
Focuses automatically while shootting video |
|
|
 |
Is thicker |
 |
Has significantly more shutter lag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Nikon D7100
Entry-level DSLR
$1,197 body only $1,497 with 18-105mm lens
|
|
 |
Has a significantly larger screen |
 |
Has a significantly higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
Is thicker |
 |
Is slightly larger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Pro DSLR
$2,479 body only $2,699 - $3,000 with 24-105mm lens
|
|
 |
Is slightly less noisy at high ISO |
 |
Slightly larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
Doesn't have a built-in flash |
 |
Is thicker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Pro DSLR
$3,250 - $3,299 body only $3,800 - $3,899 with 24-105mm lens
|
|
 |
Is significantly less noisy at high ISO |
 |
Has a significantly larger screen |
|
|
 |
Doesn't have a built-in flash |
 |
Is slightly more expensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Canon Rebel T4i
Entry-level DSLR
$580 - $799 body only $740 - $899 with 18-55mm lens
|
|
 |
Has a slightly higher resolution screen |
 |
Has a touch screen |
|
|
 |
Has a slower max shutter speed |
 |
Is thicker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No significant competitors found that are specific to the Canon EOS 7D. |
|
|
|
 |
Pentax K-30
Entry-level DSLR
$468 - $690 body only $546 - $780 with 18-55mm lens
|
|
 |
Supports 24p |
 |
Lighter |
|
|
 |
Lacks an external mic jack |
 |
Worse image quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Pentax K-5 II
Entry-level DSLR
$767 - $997 body only $933 - $1,247 with 18-55mm lens
|
|
 |
Longer battery life |
|
|
 |
Significantly more shutter lag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 10 comments
Slightly thinner
2.9"
vs
2.9"
Almost the same2.9 vs 2.9 is ALMOST the same???
though the Nikon D7000 AF system tops them all :D
And i've already looked into a full frame camera and have decided not to go that path, i don't necessarily need to spend that much on a camera for what i'll be using it for. Not to mention the Sigma lens i purchased is designed only for use on APS-C sensors, and it's basically my walk around lens. Gotta love that classic 50mm look (technically 48mm, but close enough).
Unless you have another Canon camera model you could recommend to me as an upgrade from the Rebel XS, i think i'm set on getting a 7D now. Thank you for your advice.
The K-5's image quality isn't that much better I don't think than the 7D, for example the DxOMark benchmarks show at high ISO they are very close, within 0.4 f/stops of each other.
If shooting at high ISO is really important to you (as it is to me), you might want to wait and save for a full frame camera (like the 5D Mk II or the Nikon D700), they definitely excel compared to the APS-C cameras.
I own a:
Sigma 30mm f/1.4
Canon 50mm f/1.8
Tokina 12-24mm f/4
and a Canon 430EX II Speedlight