Advantages of the Canon 60D |
 |
|
Has an optical viewfinder |
Pentaprism |
vs |
Digital |
|
Optical viewfinders save battery life and are more detailed |
|
|
 |
|
Weather sealed |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Sealed to shoot in the rain |
|
|
 |
|
Much more lenses available |
162 lenses |
vs |
92 lenses |
|
Around 80% more lenses available |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly longer battery life |
1100 shots |
vs |
550 shots |
|
2x more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution screen |
1,040k dots |
vs |
921k dots |
|
More than 10% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
More cross-type focus points |
9 |
vs |
3 |
|
Grab focus in difficult situations |
|
|
 |
|
Higher true resolution |
17.9 MP |
vs |
16 MP |
|
Capture more than 10% more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Much faster max shutter speed |
1/8000s |
vs |
1/4000s |
|
2x faster max shutter speed |
|
|
 |
|
Thinner |
3.1" |
vs |
3.2" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Sony SLT A57 |
 |
|
More dynamic range |
13 EV |
vs |
11.5 EV |
|
1.5 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Video autofocus |
Phase detection |
vs |
None |
|
Automatically focuses shooting video |
|
|
 |
|
Better image quality |
75.0 |
vs |
66.0 |
|
More than 10% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Image stabilization |
Sensor shift |
vs |
None |
|
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
23.4 bits |
vs |
22.2 bits |
|
Distinguishes 1.2 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Has in-camera HDR |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Takes 3D photos |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots much faster |
12 fps |
vs |
5.3 fps |
|
Around 2.5x faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger viewfinder |
0.72x |
vs |
0.59x |
|
Around 50% larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
|
Can create panoramas in-camera |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
16,000 ISO |
vs |
6,400 ISO |
|
The SLT A57's maximum light sensitivity is 1.3 f-stops better |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly better viewfinder coverage |
100% |
vs |
96% |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more focus points |
15 |
vs |
9 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
 |
|
Smaller |
132x98x81 mm |
vs |
145x106x79 mm |
|
More than 10% smaller |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly larger sensor |
APS-C 23.5x15.6mm |
vs |
APS-C 22.3x14.9mm |
|
More than 10% larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Better boost ISO |
25,600 ISO |
vs |
12,800 ISO |
|
The SLT A57's boost ISO is 1 f-stop better |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
618 g |
vs |
755 g |
|
Around 20% lighter |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 2 comments