Sony SLT A99 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Winner
Placeholder

100

Placeholder

96

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A99

Great image quality
Overall image quality
89.0
Great color depth
Color depth
25 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
14 EV
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
400 ms startup delay
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Pentaprism

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark II.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT A99.

competitors

Sony SLT A99 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony SLT A77 II

Pro DSLR

$1,198 body only

$1,798 with 16-50mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Focus points Significantly more focus points
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO
Placeholder

Sony Alpha a99 II

Boutique

$3,198

Focus points Many more focus points
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Placeholder

Sony SLT A77

Pro DSLR

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Viewfinder size Slightly larger viewfinder
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$1,399 body only

$1,799 with 24-105mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
GPS Has a GPS
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Placeholder

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Pro DSLR

$2,299 body only

$3,049 with 24-70mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Placeholder

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$3,299 body only

$4,049 with 24-70mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Lowest price More expensive

discussion

Placeholder
SLT A99
Sony

Report a correction
Placeholder
EOS 5D Mark II
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 4 comments

Ronny (6:16 PM, January 02, 2014)
bullshit comparison,,, 5d mark ii shud be compare with Sony A77... A99 is better then canon 5d ii n iii...
 
Guest (1:10 AM, June 19, 2013)
really?? are you giving them a tie? why? Don't you see that the a99 is a
much better camera than the 5d mark ii?. I think you are taking that
conclusion based on the price only, because the a99 has a much better dynamic range, higher true resolution, a better color depth, a larger viewfinder (who cares if it's digital, it is very sharp though), a much better hybrid autofocus system, has more storage slots, shoots faster,
has GPS, etc... the 5d is better than the a99 only in low light
performance, but for 0.2 f-stops?? c'mon!!! and who cares if canon
already has much more lenses available, you are not gonna buy more than 5
lenses anyway. I believe there's something wrong with this review, I
used to trust a lot in this page, but until now I don't rely on you any
longer. there must be somthing wrong with this page and DxO.
 
Guest (1:08 AM, June 19, 2013)
really?? are you giving them a tie? why?, don't you see that the a99 is a much better camera than the 5d mark ii. I think you are taking that conclusion based on the price only, because the a99 has much better dynamic range, higher true resolution, a better color depth, a larger viewfinder (who cares if it's digital, it is very sharp though), a much better hybrid autofocus system, has more storage slots, shoots faster, has GPS, etc... the 5d is better than the a99 only in low light performance, but for 0.2 f-stops?? c'mon!!! and who cares if canon already has much more lenses available, you are not gonna buy more than 5 lenses anyway. I believe there's something wrong with this review, I used to trust a lot in this page, but until now I don't rely on you any longer. there must be somthing wrong with this page and DxO.
 
jerry lambert (4:50 PM, May 07, 2013)
with all you get with the sony over the canon id go with the sony.