Sony SLT A99 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark II
|
Pro DSLR
$1,198 body only
$1,798 with 16-50mm lens
![]() | Shoots significantly faster |
![]() | More focus points |
![]() | Has fewer storage slots |
Mirrorless interchangeable-lens
$1,210 - $1,398 body only
$1,598 - $1,600 with 28-70mm lens
![]() | Significantly more focus points |
![]() | Much thinner |
![]() | Has fewer storage slots |
Pro DSLR
$5,103 - $5,499 body only
$6,298 with 16-35mm lens
![]() | Has an optical viewfinder |
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | Much more noise at high ISO |
Pro DSLR
$999 - $1,029 body only
$1,399 - $2,299 with 24-105mm lens
![]() | Has a GPS |
![]() | Slightly higher resolution screen |
![]() | Much slower max shutter speed |
Pro DSLR
$949 with 18-55mm lens
![]() | Has a touch screen |
![]() | Has a flip-out screen |
![]() | Much more noise at high ISO |
Pro DSLR
$1,999 - $2,349 body only
$2,599 - $2,699 with 24-105mm lens
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | Has more storage slots |
![]() | Slightly heavier |
Showing 4 comments
much better camera than the 5d mark ii?. I think you are taking that
conclusion based on the price only, because the a99 has a much better dynamic range, higher true resolution, a better color depth, a larger viewfinder (who cares if it's digital, it is very sharp though), a much better hybrid autofocus system, has more storage slots, shoots faster,
has GPS, etc... the 5d is better than the a99 only in low light
performance, but for 0.2 f-stops?? c'mon!!! and who cares if canon
already has much more lenses available, you are not gonna buy more than 5
lenses anyway. I believe there's something wrong with this review, I
used to trust a lot in this page, but until now I don't rely on you any
longer. there must be somthing wrong with this page and DxO.