Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs Nikon D7000
|
Pro DSLR
$999 - $1,499 body only
$1,330 - $1,899 with 24-105mm lens
![]() | Has a GPS |
![]() | Higher resolution screen |
![]() | Much slower max shutter speed |
Pro DSLR
$2,300 body only
$2,844 with 50mm lens
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | Many more focus points |
![]() | Slightly larger |
Pro DSLR
$1,877 with 18-135mm lens
![]() | Much less shutter lag |
![]() | Shoots much faster |
![]() | Significantly smaller viewfinder |
Entry-level DSLR
$474 body only
$459 with 18-55mm lens
![]() | Lower frame rate movies |
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | No weather sealing |
Pro DSLR
$1,149 - $1,297 body only
$1,797 with 24-120mm lens
![]() | Lower frame rate movies |
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | Fewer lenses available |
Entry-level DSLR
$709 body only
$1,097 with 18-55mm lens
![]() | Lower frame rate movies |
![]() | Significantly larger screen |
![]() | Slightly shorter battery life |
Showing 25 comments
ITS IMPRESSIVE http://pictureexposure.com/pin/245772
MAKE SURE YOU VIEW IN 1080P
important. Nikon is compatible with any nikon lens so Any person who has
a Nikon D7000 or what ever can buy the best lenses of the decades of
60`s or 70`s or 90`s when lenses used to be constructed with glass and
never with plastic like all those new lenses of Nikon or Canon, so if
you compare them only because the body, I think canon could win only
because the sensor and the ISO, but if you campare them because how can
you work with, Nikon can be the winner becasue you can get glass lenses,
lenses truth!!!!
the 70-200 2.8 is/vr II lens was rate below the sigma lens in the same category (ps. vr is vribration reduction form nikon is internal stabilision from canon dont mix them up 'nube')
then among other thing canon lenses are made from plastic mostly and some even have plastic mount. such as your 50mm.
and the only reson you think its cheaper is because canon keeps all the old stock. they still sel lenses from the 10 years ago. thats why some lenses apear to be cheaper.
lastly canon is toy, camera i mean it's made of plastic. wen u a redy to be considerd a profetional camera user try using a nikon some time. for one sony cameras are moving past canon in some ways
my recommendation : Canon 5d mark ii
Second, get rid of that popularity multiplier, it's just silly.
Just my 2 cents, otherwise this site ROCKS! Keep it going :)
24-70 2.8 Canon is $620 cheaper
85 1.8 Canon is $102 Cheaper
85 1.2 doesn't exist on Nikon
50 1.4 Canon is $90 Cheaper (usually more but amazon is having sale)
50 1.8 Canon is $112
35 1.4 Canon is $444 cheaper
All prices based on amazon.com @ 8:25pm 12/22/2011
How is Leonard a nube?
i have the nikon d7000. one of my friends bought his 5d mark ii last month. we exchange our camera for a week. i admonished myself the whole week why i didnt buy the 5d mark ii. image quality, iso range, color & almost everything is 30 % better than my nikon d7000. basically if you are not shooting SPORTS, the canon 5d mark ii is just perfect.
my recommendation : nikon d7000 is FAST, no doubt but if you are looking for QUALITY 'IMAGE & VIDEO' grab the 5d mark ii.