Nikon D4 vs Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Winner
Nikon D4

100

Canon EOS 5D Mark II

85

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D4

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,965 ISO
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.1 EV
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Thickness
Thin
3"
Overall image quality
Great image quality
79.0
Color depth
Great color depth
23.7 bits
Live view
Has live view
Preview your photos

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark II.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D4.

competitors

Nikon D4 Competitors

Nikon D4s

Nikon D4s

Pro DSLR

$4,997 body only

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Nikon D5

Nikon D5

Pro DSLR

$5,561 - $6,497 body only

$6,731 with 50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Nikon D3S

Nikon D3S

Pro DSLR

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Thickness Thinner
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Competitors

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$999 - $1,029 body only

$1,399 - $2,299 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$949 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO
Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

Pro DSLR

$1,999 - $2,349 body only

$2,599 - $2,699 with 24-105mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion

Nikon D4
D4
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon EOS 5D Mark II
EOS 5D Mark II
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 3 comments

Pieropereira (2:38 AM, January 10, 2012)
Thanks Parksed, I really work on studio and try to get the most of size and resolution from my photographs rather than high speed shooting or high ISO. Maybe I have to move to medium format to upgrade from my D300
 
Parksed24 (0:35 AM, January 10, 2012)
I believe that 16megs allows for a much better low noise/high ISO quality.  The D4 shoots very crisp photos in the higher ISO range compared to other cameras from what I've heard.

Guess it depends on what you'd like to use your camera for, I'm particularly interested in live band shots and night time photography so (provided I could come up with THAT much extra money) I would go for the D4.  

I shoot a D7000 now and that does pretty darn well in low light situations, so I'm imagining the D4 should blow it away.
 
Pieropereira (9:05 PM, January 09, 2012)
I use Nikons since 1972 but at these point why should i spend  US$6K on a 16Meg D4 if Canon 5DMII sells at US$2.5K and throws 21MEGS!!!
Can somebody answer this question?