Canon EOS 5D Mark II vs Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Winner
Canon EOS 5D Mark II

152

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

81

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 5D Mark II

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
1,815 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
79.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.7 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.9 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (127×94×65 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.6"
Weight
Light-weight
556 g
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 5D Mark II.
Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi.

competitors

Canon EOS 5D Mark II Competitors

Canon EOS 6D

Canon EOS 6D

Pro DSLR

$949 - $999 body only

$1,399 - $1,999 with 24-105mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Screen resolution Slightly higher resolution screen
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Canon EOS 70D

Canon EOS 70D

Pro DSLR

$1,345 with 18-135mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Low light performance Much more noise at high ISO
Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D

Entry-level DSLR

$999 - $1,498 body only

$945 - $1,049 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$370 body only

$390 with 18-55mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Screen size Much larger screen
Thickness Much thicker
Canon Rebel T3

Canon Rebel T3

Entry-level DSLR

$380 with 18-55mm lens

Live view Has live view
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Thickness Much thicker
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Canon EOS Digital Rebel XS

Entry-level DSLR

Live view Has live view
Battery life Slightly longer battery life

discussion

Canon EOS 5D Mark II
EOS 5D Mark II
Canon

Report a correction
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments