Updated (February 2010): Compare the Canon EOS 550D vs Nikon D90

Nikon D90 vs Canon EOS 550D

Nikon D90


Canon EOS 550D



Reasons to buy the Nikon D90

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
Great viewfinder
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
208 ms shutter lag
Great battery life
Battery life
850 shots

Reasons to buy the Canon EOS 550D

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Really small
Prosumer size (129×98×62 mm)


Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon EOS 550D.
Explore our gallery of 47 sample photos taken by the Nikon D90.


Nikon D90 Competitors

Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$474 body only

$459 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Nikon D300S

Nikon D300S


$1,755 body only

$2,299 with 18-200mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Size Much larger
Canon EOS 600D

Canon EOS 600D

Entry-level DSLR

$425 body only

$532 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder

Canon EOS 550D Competitors

Canon EOS 600D

Canon EOS 600D

Entry-level DSLR

$425 body only

$532 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Much larger
Canon EOS 1100D

Canon EOS 1100D

Entry-level DSLR

$332 body only

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Canon EOS 1200D

Canon EOS 1200D

Entry-level DSLR

$385 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen


Nikon D90

Report a correction
Canon EOS 550D
EOS 550D

Report a correction

Showing 25 comments

Avatar for Muhammad Farooqi Muhammad Farooqi (11:25 AM, January 13, 2015)
i've the same 550D :p
Brian (0:13 PM, September 03, 2013)
BUILD QUALITY.... Not even Canon "Fanboys" would say that the Canon 550d feels as solid and well made as the Nikon D90. Come on Canon fanboys you HAVE to be honest and admit the Nikon D90 is SO MUCH better built!
C.E.S 12 (5:34 PM, April 14, 2013)
only 420 shots :P NIKON for US
C.E.S 12 (5:32 PM, April 14, 2013)
AGREED (Y) Megapixel has nothing to with Picture Clarity :)
C.E.S 12 (5:30 PM, April 14, 2013)
these comparisons are rated based on Photography Experiences... Actually MP has nothing to do with Picture Clarity... and about Cropping... A real photographer don't edit or crop photos. If MP does really matters then, There is, This one Nokia Phone which has 42Mp... that is you Camera... I personally recommend you that :P lol hahahahahah
C.E.S 12 (5:23 PM, April 14, 2013)
you need to shut up too... because all these comparison are shits...
stankovich (5:20 PM, April 14, 2013)
its the best (Y) old but still the best... its a much better camera than 550d at least :P
Avatar for Satyam Joshi Satyam Joshi (4:13 PM, October 13, 2012)
Now I understand why Nikon is more popular in USA and Europe because they use left hand ..and every setting button is in left side..... ;) !
Avatar for Satyam Joshi Satyam Joshi (4:11 PM, October 13, 2012)
550D "Q"(quick button is my savior ! It helps me to get quick access to different settings and its vdo live shoot manual exposure control really beats other ! though it has less color depth , but who posts,uploads without editing now-a-days..so color depth is no problem.I vote for 550D !
Lovevelentine2 (9:44 AM, May 10, 2012)
I used both Cameras, My point of view CANON EOS 550D is Best & Reason is
1, Cheaper than Nikon D90
2, More Mega Pixels
3, Great LCD View
4, For Live sound Recording Input
5, Light Weight
6, Free Carry Case
7, For Print Large Banner You don't loose quality
8, Great Useful For Professional & Wedding Photographer
9, Full HD Video Recording
10, I Take more than 800 shots / Day
Mini_salter (1:57 PM, May 02, 2012)
 For me (an amateur photographer) I prefer having a slightly smaller body when it comes to cameras. I've got the 550D, and I much prefer it to my friends D90, which I find awkward to hold as it is heavier. Obviously, personal preference is what's important. For me, being a small person (with small hands too!) the lighter, smaller body is perfect for me. This site is designed to explain many different aspects of cameras to ALL photographers , whether they be beginners or professionals.
Mydreamname (11:00 PM, April 05, 2012)
I have used D90 and own a 550D as well as 1Ds. D90 with 550D have no difference at all. Image quality has to do with the lenses not the bodies of these cameras. A good glass in any of these cameras will make the other look inferior if using cheap lenses. Both with good lenses give great results. Personally I went for 550D. After all is a personal choice.
Arun ajay (5:33 AM, February 24, 2012)
Compare to D90 . most needed things 550D is better in my view. Myself i recommended to buy a 550D .
Ben (3:19 PM, February 10, 2012)
Ben (3:19 PM, February 10, 2012)
Ben (3:18 PM, February 10, 2012)
Fdg Es (11:21 AM, December 11, 2011)
Connorjohnpritchett (8:16 AM, October 28, 2011)
I don't care what this review says, I think the canon eos 550d is better than the d90 - From Canon Fanboy
T Pibulsilp (3:45 AM, October 02, 2011)
What really grates me is that all comparisons i find seem to be technical. I would rather see an actual photo comparison. What is true in theory does not always hold true in the real world where cameras are actually used. I would like to let my eyes judge what rendering etc i like. 
Melani (0:45 PM, September 29, 2011)
I am a first time camera shopper, female, and love to take pictures of people, cropping them, see how to make any occation, one to remember. I do care about the size and weight, I do care about video, I do care about MP, why drive a V6 when you can have a V8.  Thank you for all the comments, all of it was helpfull.  My choice, Canon, lighter, smaller, video and, as was mentioned, easier to master.  When I master this one, I'll buy the other one as well, then I can do Bill boards and scrapbooks.
Thanks for a great site
canonikon (8:31 AM, June 14, 2011)
Personally, for me, i think the 550d is slightly better. The 550d would be better for the people who are new to DSLRs, since this camera is a little easier to use than the Nikon. However, the Nikon is a camera for more of the people that have used DSLRs for a longer time. I have both of the Nikon D90 and the Canon 550d, and they are both excellent cameras. The canon 550d is magnificent at Macro shots, and the Nikon is fantastic for taking long-distanse shots, and it was zoom in quite well. 
I enjoy using the 550d better, since it took quite a long time for me to get used to the Nikon and all of it's different buttons. 
Overall, if you are new to DSLRs, i'd recommend the 550d. :)
Ilia (8:44 AM, March 04, 2011)
D90 is the best
Darkacre (3:56 PM, January 30, 2011)
I think what it comes down to is preference & priorities - what do you think is more important? There is no clear winner here; for the snobs that are suggesting Nikon outclassing Canon (or vise versa), clearly have their own agenda. IQ wise, you can't really argue either way. Technically you can say that Nikon have slightly better image quality and but then you can also argue that Canon clearly has the 5 Meg pixel advantage. For those that argues its not the pixel that counts, then why not buy a Nikon with 10 meg pixels? It does matter to some degree . 5% this, 10% that.... In the end result, if you look at the photos, we are talking about literally no difference visually, one way or the other - both producing gorgeous images - you literally can't tell them apart if you took 1000 pictures each and mix them up. Unless you plan to make a billboard from it (thats where the 18 M pixels will come in handy.)

Yes Nikon is a bit faster and auto-focus a tad better.. But then Canon gives you better video recording resolution and control. In the end I went with Canon because of the video features.
To me 4.5 fps vs 3.7 fps shutter speed may translate to 20% faster shutter speed for Nikon but in the real world, .8 fps really doesn't mean anything. I mean you take 4 shots instead of 3 shots per second, are you really counting? If you are really into sports, then you should be looking at 7-10 fps cameras, not these .8 fps difference. Of course on the other hand, some people may not need the video advantage of Canon, then why not buy a cheaper Nikon without video?
Salonjoe (6:07 PM, January 22, 2011)
but d7000 is batter
Salonjoe (6:06 PM, January 22, 2011)
nikon d90 is the best ............................