Advantages of the Canon EOS-1D Mark IV |
 |
|
Shoots significantly faster |
10 fps |
vs |
4 fps |
|
2.5x faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly more cross-type focus points |
39 |
vs |
15 |
|
Grab focus in difficult situations |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly longer battery life |
1500 shots |
vs |
900 shots |
|
Around 70% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly less shutter lag |
104 ms |
vs |
209 ms |
|
2x less delay when taking photos |
|
|
 |
|
Better boost ISO |
102,400 ISO |
vs |
25,600 ISO |
|
The EOS-1D Mark IV's boost ISO is 2 f-stops better |
|
|
 |
|
Better maximum light sensitivity |
12,800 ISO |
vs |
6,400 ISO |
|
The EOS-1D Mark IV's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more lenses available |
125 lenses |
vs |
121 lenses |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Thinner |
3.1" |
vs |
3.2" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Nikon D800 |
 |
|
Significantly lower noise at high ISO |
2,853 ISO |
vs |
1,320 ISO |
|
The D800 has excellent image quality 1.1 f-stops higher ISO than the EOS-1D Mark IV |
|
|
 |
|
Much better image quality |
95.0 |
vs |
74.0 |
|
Around 30% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Much higher true resolution |
36.2 MP |
vs |
16 MP |
|
Capture around 2.5x more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Has an external mic jack |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Record high quality audio with an external microphone |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
25.3 bits |
vs |
22.8 bits |
|
Distinguishes 2.5 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
14.4 EV |
vs |
12 EV |
|
2.4 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger screen |
3.2" |
vs |
3.0" |
|
Around 10% larger screen |
|
|
 |
|
Has in-camera HDR |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger viewfinder |
0.72x |
vs |
0.59x |
|
Around 50% larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger sensor |
Full frame 35.9x24.0mm |
vs |
APS-H 27.9x18.6mm |
|
Around 70% larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution screen |
1,040k dots |
vs |
920k dots |
|
More than 10% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly smaller |
146x123x82 mm |
vs |
156x157x80 mm |
|
More than 20% smaller |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more focus points |
51 |
vs |
45 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly less startup delay |
200 ms |
vs |
400 ms |
|
2x less delay when turning on |
|
|
 |
|
Built-in flash |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
A built-in flash is useful for taking indoor shots where there is little light |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
1,000 g |
vs |
1,230 g |
|
Around 20% lighter |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 1 comments