Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs Sony SLT-A33

Sony SLT A33 vs Canon Rebel T3i

Tie
Sony SLT-A33

58

Canon Rebel T3i

56

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony SLT A33

Great color depth
Color depth
22.8 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
12.6 EV
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
7 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor cleaning
Self cleaning sensor
Avoids dust in your photos
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony SLT-A33.

competitors

Sony SLT-A33 Competitors

Sony SLT A58

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

$598 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony SLT A37

Sony SLT A37

Entry-level DSLR

$600 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony SLT-A55

Sony SLT A55

Entry-level DSLR

Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Dynamic range Less dynamic range

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$429 - $649 body only

$599 with 18-55mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Autofocus Video autofocus
Color depth Worse color depth
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$310 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Lowest price Much cheaper
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$749 with 18-55mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Cross type focus points Many more cross-type focus points
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

discussion

Sony SLT-A33
SLT A33
Sony

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T3i
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments