Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 vs Canon Rebel T3i

Winner
Sony Alpha DSLR-A560

65

Canon Rebel T3i

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha DSLR-A560

Great color depth
Color depth
22.5 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
12.3 EV
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
7 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Sensor cleaning
Self cleaning sensor
Avoids dust in your photos
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha DSLR-A560.

competitors

Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 Competitors

Sony SLT-A68

Sony SLT-A68

Boutique

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Size Much smaller
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha DSLR-A580

Sony Alpha DSLR-A580

Entry-level DSLR

Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Supports 24p No 24p support

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$398 - $649 body only

$479 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Autofocus Video autofocus
Color depth Worse color depth
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$325 body only

$379 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$799 with 18-55mm lens

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Cross type focus points Many more cross-type focus points
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

discussion

Sony Alpha DSLR-A560
Alpha DSLR-A560
Sony

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T3i
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments