Canon Rebel T3i vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon Rebel T3i

44

Samsung NX200

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
12.6 EV
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$395 - $649 body only

$495 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$289 body only

$360 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Size Slightly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$279 body only

$349 - $397 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$469 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Size Slightly larger
Samsung NX500

Samsung NX500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$631 body only

$798 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Startup delay Much less startup delay
Size Slightly larger
Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon Rebel T3i
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments