Canon Rebel T3i vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon Rebel T3i

55

Samsung NX200

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,040k dots
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Color depth
Great color depth
22.6 bits
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
12.6 EV
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$317 - $649 body only

$376 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weight Lighter
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$425 - $649 body only

$517 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Startup delay Less startup delay
Overall image quality Significantly worse image quality
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$349 body only

$399 - $420 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weight Lighter
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Samsung NX300

Samsung NX300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$772 body only

$730 with 20-50mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Slightly larger
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$400

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Sony NEX 5R

Sony NEX 5R

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Color depth Better color depth
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon Rebel T3i
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments