Canon Rebel T3i vs Samsung NX200

Winner
Canon Rebel T3i

53

Samsung NX200

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung NX200

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×63×36 mm)
Color depth
Great color depth
22.6 bits
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
12.6 EV
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Samsung NX200.

competitors

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$325 body only

$379 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Weight Lighter
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$421 - $649 body only

$540 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$749 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Overall image quality Better image quality
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

Samsung NX200 Competitors

Samsung NX2000

Samsung NX2000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 with 20-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$421 - $649 body only

$540 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Samsung NX1100

Samsung NX1100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$492 with 20-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Canon Rebel T3i
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung NX200
NX200
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments