Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon Rebel T3i vs Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000 vs Canon Rebel T3i

Winner
Placeholder

161

Placeholder

110

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D7000

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
1,167 ISO
Great image quality
Overall image quality
80.0
Great color depth
Color depth
23.5 bits
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.9 EV
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3i

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Sensor cleaning
Self cleaning sensor
Avoids dust in your photos

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3i.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D7000.

competitors

Nikon D7000 Competitors

Placeholder

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$799 - $997 body only

$1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Placeholder

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$1,036 with 18-55mm, 70-300mm lenses

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Placeholder

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$500 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Lower frame rate movies
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder

Canon Rebel T3i Competitors

Placeholder

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$649 body only

$599 with 18-55mm lens

Startup delay Much less startup delay
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Color depth Worse color depth
Placeholder

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$495 with 18-55mm, 75-300mm lenses

Autofocus Video autofocus
Size Smaller
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Placeholder

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$699 body only

$449 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Size Smaller
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Placeholder
D7000
Nikon

Report a correction
Placeholder
Rebel T3i
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments