Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 vs Canon Rebel T3

Tie
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

40

Canon Rebel T3

40

Tie

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha DSLR-A330

Great color depth
Color depth
22.4 bits
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
199 ms shutter lag
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay
Battery life
Great battery life
700 shots
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha DSLR-A330.

competitors

Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$294 body only

$400 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230

Sony Alpha DSLR-A230

Entry-level DSLR

$338 body only

Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
Thickness Thinner
Live view No live view
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$249 body only

$309 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon Rebel T3 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$399 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$669 body only

$599 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$219 body only

$280 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Alpha DSLR-A330
Sony

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T3
Rebel T3
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments