Nikon D5000 vs Canon Rebel T3

Winner
Nikon D5000

97

Canon Rebel T3

81

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D5000

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Has live view
Live view
Preview your photos
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
400 ms startup delay
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Rebel T3

Live view
Has live view
Preview your photos
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
300 ms startup delay
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Rebel T3.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D5000.

competitors

Nikon D5000 Competitors

Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$326 body only

$398 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$329 body only

$540 with 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$300 body only

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Canon Rebel T3 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$370 body only

$289 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS Rebel T2i

Canon Rebel T2i

Entry-level DSLR

$549 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$329 body only

$540 with 18-55mm, 55-200mm lenses

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder

discussion

Nikon D5000
D5000
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon Rebel T3
Rebel T3
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments