Advantages of the Canon T3 |
 |
|
Longer battery life |
700 shots |
vs |
540 shots |
|
Around 30% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Has a built-in focus motor |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Autofocuses with all autofocus lenses |
|
|
 |
|
Larger viewfinder |
0.54x |
vs |
0.50x |
|
More than 10% larger viewfinder |
|
|
 |
|
Cheaper |
$327.69 |
vs |
$546.95 |
|
The best price we've seen is $219 cheaper (more than 40% less) |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly less startup delay |
300 ms |
vs |
400 ms |
|
Around 30% less delay when turning on |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
459 g |
vs |
505 g |
|
Around 10% lighter |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Nikon D3200 |
 |
|
Higher resolution movies |
1080p @ 30fps |
vs |
720p @ 30fps |
|
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video |
|
|
 |
|
Much better image quality |
81.0 |
vs |
62.0 |
|
More than 30% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly lower noise at high ISO |
1,131 ISO |
vs |
755 ISO |
|
The D3200 has a slight edge (0.6 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
13.2 EV |
vs |
11 EV |
|
2.2 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Much higher resolution screen |
921k dots |
vs |
230k dots |
|
More than 4x higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
24.1 bits |
vs |
21.9 bits |
|
Distinguishes 2.2 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Much larger screen |
3.0" |
vs |
2.7" |
|
More than 10% larger screen |
|
|
 |
|
Much higher true resolution |
24.1 MP |
vs |
12.2 MP |
|
Capture around 2x more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Has an external mic jack |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Record high quality audio with an external microphone |
|
|
 |
|
Supports 24p |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Get that real film feel |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly larger sensor |
APS-C 23.2x15.4mm |
vs |
APS-C 22.2x14.7mm |
|
Around 10% larger sensor |
|
|
|
|
Video autofocus |
Contrast detection |
vs |
None |
|
Automatically focuses shooting video |
|
|
 |
|
Has a self cleaning sensor |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Removes dust from the sensor automatically, avoiding spots in photos |
|
|
 |
|
Smaller |
125x96x76 mm |
vs |
130x100x78 mm |
|
Around 10% smaller |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots faster |
4 fps |
vs |
3 fps |
|
More than 30% faster continuous shooting |
|
|
 |
|
Less shutter lag |
276 ms |
vs |
309 ms |
|
More than 10% less delay when taking photos |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more lenses available |
169 lenses |
vs |
162 lenses |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly more focus points |
11 |
vs |
9 |
|
Set focus accurately within the frame |
|
|
|
|
Thinner |
3" |
vs |
3.1" |
|
Almost the same |
|
|
|
|
|
Showing 0 comments