Canon Powershot SX40 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Tie
Canon Powershot SX40

43

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

42

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot SX40

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100

Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot SX40.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100.

competitors

Canon Powershot SX40 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$305

Zoom More zoom
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$329

Screen size Much larger screen
Size Much smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$364 - $449

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Much larger screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$455 - $498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$274 - $298

Zoom Much more zoom
3D Takes 3D photos
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $698

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot SX40
Powershot SX40
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100
Lumix DMC-FZ100
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments