Canon Powershot SX40 vs Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Tie
Canon Powershot SX40

46

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

45

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot SX40

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Great battery life
Battery life
380 shots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot SX40.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS10.

competitors

Canon Powershot SX40 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S4800

Fujifilm FinePix S4800

Super zoom

$230

Screen size Much larger screen
Size Slightly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$411

Zoom More zoom
Screen size Larger screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Canon PowerShot SX530 HS

Super zoom

$254 - $279

Screen size Much larger screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix HS10 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$700

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,398

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Canon Powershot SX40
Powershot SX40
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS10
FinePix HS10
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments