Canon PowerShot S90 vs Canon Powershot SX40

Winner
Canon PowerShot S90

41

Canon Powershot SX40

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S90

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (100×58×31 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.2"
Light-weight
Weight
198 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot SX40

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10.3 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot SX40.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S90.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S90 Competitors

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$399

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix A300

Nikon Coolpix A300

Travel zoom

$137

Wide angle Better wide angle
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

Canon Powershot SX40 Competitors

Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$269 body only

$419 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$335 - $699 body only

$370 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510

Super zoom

$450

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot S90
PowerShot S90
Canon

Report a correction
Canon Powershot SX40
Powershot SX40
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments