| Canon PowerShot SX260 HS |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Canon PowerShot SX260 HS |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V | ||||||||
| Snapsort recommends the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS. |
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses |
|---|---|
|
Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products. |
Snapsort is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products. |
Shared Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Canon PowerShot SX280 HSTravel zoom $268 - $299 |
|
|||||||||||||
Panasonic Lumix ZS20Travel zoom $299 - $378 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon PowerShot SX240 HSTravel zoom $219 - $678 |
|
|||||||||||||
Panasonic Lumix ZS30Travel zoom $349 - $399 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Nikon Coolpix S9500Travel zoom $297 - $327 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50VTravel zoom $448 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300Travel zoom $278 - $298 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
Canon PowerShot SX270 HSTravel zoom $355 - $393 |
|
|
||||||||||||
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Competitors |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
||||||||||||
No significant competitors found that are specific to the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V. |
||||||||||||||
Showing 2 comments
Sony HX20V is
definitely the best travel zoom for
2012. Simply amazing. Great zoom, very good photo quality (very decent for a travel
zoom), good photos with low light (better than HX9V), amazing (stunning) macro,
fantastic video recording (the same quality as HX9V), decent battery life, very
good materials... in comparison, its main 2012's
competitors, Canon SX 240 - SX 260 and Nikon 9300, are not better in photo
quality (about the same quality) and are far worst in video quality (much worst.)
Canon's 24 fps in video is just ridiculous. Instead of a film look you get
jerky videos. I returned a Canon SX230 for that reason. Canon should definitely
do something about it. And Nikon 9300 is worst than both, at least for me. Not good enough. Many people bought the Sony
HX9V only because of a much better video quality compared to the rest,
especially compared to Canon’s SX 220-230, even if the photo quality was
slightly inferior, but the new Sony HX20V not only is still much better in
video but it also makes amazing pictures, at the Canon SX 240-260’s level. For
real. With regard to the HX20V's main disadvantages, I would say: a) price. Too
expensive! You can buy a Canon S100 for that price! B) manual control: still
no full manual control. Canon is better in that aspect.