Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS






Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
320 shots

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Built-in GPS
Great for travel


Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V.


Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V Competitors


Samsung EX2F

Pro digicam

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
GPS No built-in GPS

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom


Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Narrower aperture

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Travel zoom

Size Much smaller
Weight Much lighter
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors


Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Slightly smaller
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Nikon Coolpix S3700

Travel zoom


Size Significantly smaller
Battery life Longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS


Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Report a correction
PowerShot SX260 HS

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

bob (2:02 AM, May 08, 2013)
In your camera comparisons you leave out autofocus speed & accuracy, in both normal & low light. This is one of the most important camera attributes and the Sony's shine in this category compared to most others. Maybe you don't mind wasting what would have been good shots to blur.
Pete J (5:01 PM, April 08, 2012)

Sony HX20V is
definitely  the best travel zoom for
2012. Simply amazing. Great zoom, very good photo quality (very decent for a travel
zoom), good photos with low light (better than HX9V), amazing (stunning) macro,
fantastic video recording (the same quality as HX9V), decent battery life, very
good materials...     in comparison, its main 2012's
competitors, Canon SX 240 - SX 260 and Nikon 9300, are not better in photo
quality (about the same quality) and are far worst in video quality (much worst.)
Canon's 24 fps in video is just ridiculous. Instead of a film look you get
jerky videos. I returned a Canon SX230 for that reason. Canon should definitely
do something about it. And Nikon 9300 is worst than both, at least for me.  Not good enough. Many people bought the Sony
HX9V only because of a much better video quality compared to the rest,
especially compared to Canon’s SX 220-230, even if the photo quality was
slightly inferior, but the new Sony HX20V not only is still much better in
video but it also makes amazing pictures, at the Canon SX 240-260’s level. For
real. With regard to the HX20V's main disadvantages, I would say: a) price. Too
expensive! You can buy a Canon S100 for that price! B) manual control: still
no full manual control. Canon is better in that aspect.