Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Samsung WB150F

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

64

Samsung WB150F

55

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB150F

Size
Really small
Compact (107×60×23 mm)
Thickness
Thin
0.9"
Weight
Light-weight
188 g
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 31 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB150F.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$265 - $299

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Travel zoom

$265

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$197

Size Smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Samsung WB150F Competitors

Samsung WB350F

Samsung WB350F

Travel zoom

$180 - $219

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Wider aperture
Size Larger
Samsung WB200F

Samsung WB200F

Travel zoom

$169

Thickness Slightly thinner
Weight Heavier
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$199

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Weight Heavier

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Samsung WB150F
WB150F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments