Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

74

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

71

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (105×58×33 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Travel zoom

$306

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ57

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ57

Travel zoom

$294

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Travel zoom

Battery life Much longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS
Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Pro digicam

$305

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$502

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments