Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Nikon Coolpix S9300

Nikon Coolpix S9300 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Tie
Nikon Coolpix S9300

61

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

59

Tie

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9300

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Really small
Size
Compact (109×62×31 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.2"
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact (106×61×33 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9300.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9300 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Nikon Coolpix S9500

Travel zoom

$230

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Zoom More zoom
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Samsung WB150F

Samsung WB150F

Travel zoom

$275

Size Smaller
Wide angle Better wide angle
GPS No built-in GPS
Nikon Coolpix S2700

Nikon Coolpix S2700

Compact

$167

Size Significantly smaller
Weight Significantly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Travel zoom

Battery life Longer battery life
Weight Slightly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom More zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$251 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9300
Coolpix S9300
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments