Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot S95

59

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S95

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (100×58×30 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.2"
Light-weight
Weight
193 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Zoom
Great zoom
20x
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S95.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S95 Competitors

Nikon 1 J5

Nikon 1 J5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$333 - $497 with 10-30mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$476

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$240

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Aperture Much narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268 - $453

Size Significantly smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Pentax Q-S1

Pentax Q-S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$315 with 5-15mm lens

Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G10

Canon PowerShot G10

Pro digicam

$582

Battery life Much longer battery life
Aperture Wider aperture
Size Much larger

discussion

Canon PowerShot S95
PowerShot S95
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments