Updated (February 2012): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS vs Canon PowerShot S95

Canon PowerShot S95 vs Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Winner
Canon PowerShot S95

50

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S95

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (100×58×30 mm)
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX260 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot S95.

competitors

Canon PowerShot S95 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$445

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Lowest price More expensive
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$418

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Supports 24p No 24p support

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$285 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Travel zoom

$324

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Lowest price Cheaper
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$259 - $260

Size Significantly smaller
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Canon PowerShot S95
PowerShot S95
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS
PowerShot SX260 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments