Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5 vs Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5

42

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5

Really small
Size
Super compact (95×53×23 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
159 g
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Compact

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330

Ultra compact

$140

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ1

Travel zoom

$177

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Slightly larger

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$195 - $229

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$699

Aperture Much wider aperture
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Size Much larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5
Lumix DMC-FS5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
PowerShot SX240 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments