Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5 vs Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5

41

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

34

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5

Really small
Size
Super compact (95×53×23 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
159 g
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8

Travel zoom

$430

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$345 - $347

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS3

Compact

$380

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$310 - $379

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$139 - $227

Size Smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$279

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS5
Lumix DMC-FS5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
PowerShot SX240 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments