vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact 105x63x36 mm
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
11 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Size
Really small
Compact 106x61x33 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon SX240 HS

Report a correction
Supports 24p Supports 24p Yes vs No
Help
Get that real film feel
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Size Smaller 106x61x33 mm vs 105x63x36 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Thickness Thinner 1.3" vs 1.4"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Weight Slightly lighter 224 g vs 234 g
Help
Almost the same
Longest exposure Longer exposures 15s vs 8s
Help
Around 90% longer exposures
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Learn more about
the Canon SX240 HS

Advantages of the Fujifilm F770 EXR

Report a correction
GPS Has a GPS Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Continuous shooting Shoots faster 11 fps vs 2.4 fps
Help
More than 4.5x faster continuous shooting
Supports RAW Shoots RAW Yes vs No
Help
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies 320 fps vs 240 fps
Help
More than 30% higher fps
True resolution Higher true resolution 10.6 MP vs 9.7 MP
Help
Capture around 10% more detail in your photos
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor 1/2" 6.4x4.8mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
Help
Around 10% larger sensor
Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR Learn more about
the Fujifilm F770 EXR
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Canon PowerShot SX240 HS 61

vs

71 Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Zoom Great zoom Help
20x
High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
SX240 HS:240 fps
F770 EXR:320 fps
Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Sensor type Better sensor types Help
Better in low light
Weight Heavy Help
SX240 HS:224 g
F770 EXR:234 g
Thickness Quite thick Help
SX240 HS:1.3"
F770 EXR:1.4"
Size Large Help
SX240 HS:106x61x33 mm
F770 EXR:105x63x36 mm
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/3.5

Compared to recent travel zooms

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Snapsort is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$235 - $300

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

Travel zoom

$242 - $281

Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
Panorama Lacks a built in panoramas
Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

Travel zoom

$199 - $252

Size Is slightly smaller
Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
Panorama Lacks a built in panoramas
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Travel zoom

$299 - $350

Zoom Has way more more zoom
Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
Weight Is slightly heavier
Panorama Lacks a built in panoramas
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Super zoom

$199 - $250

Zoom Has way more more zoom
Macro focus Significantly closer macro focusing
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is much heavier
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Travel zoom

$320 - $399

Size Is slightly smaller
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity
Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Travel zoom

$221 - $240

Size Is slightly smaller
Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
Light sensitivity (boost) Slightly lower boost light sensitivity

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Travel zoom

$380 - $392

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Supports 24p No 24p support
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$144

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Significantly smaller
Supports 24p No 24p support
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

$189 - $200

GPS Has a GPS
Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom Less zoom
Wide angle Worse wide angle

Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Travel zoom

Size Smaller
External flash Supports an external flash
GPS No built-in GPS
Zoom Less zoom
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$197 - $227

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
GPS No built-in GPS
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR

Digicam

$240

Weight Lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

Travel zoom

$295

GPS No built-in GPS
Supports RAW No RAW support
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR

Travel zoom

$193 - $336

Size Slightly smaller
GPS No built-in GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

appearance

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS
PowerShot SX240 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix F770 EXR
FinePix F770 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments