Sony Cybershot WX7 vs Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7

64

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot WX7

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.6
Really small
Size
Super compact (95×56×20 mm)
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7 Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX9

Sony Cybershot WX9

Compact

$290

Screen size Significantly larger screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Lowest price More expensive
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$185

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80

Travel zoom

$230

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$199

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Travel zoom

$229

Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$479 - $599

Aperture Much wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-WX7
Cybershot WX7
Sony

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments