Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Winner
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

64

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Really small
Size
Compact (106×59×33 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
  2. Sensor shift
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (104×64×33 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 20 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$294

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Travel zoom

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$455 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Much larger

Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F665 EXR

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
External flash Supports an external flash
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F305EXR

Travel zoom

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS 80D

Canon EOS 80D

Entry-level DSLR

$999 - $1,498 body only

$1,149 - $1,549 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Much larger

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR
FinePix F500 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments