Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Tie
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

32

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

30

Tie

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Battery life
Great battery life
340 shots
Macro focus
Great macro
0.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS.
Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS.

competitors

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$280

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Super zoom

$445

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Larger
Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

Super zoom

$199

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$179 - $197

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
PowerShot SX230 HS
Canon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
PowerShot SX20 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments