Updated (September, 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs Canon Powershot S100

Canon PowerShot S95

77

"The Canon PowerShot S95 is an easy pick for our Highly Recommended award."
photographyblog.com | talking about the S95's overall-performance
"Image quality is still excellent, with a usable ISO range of 80-800 and fast f/2.0 maximum aperture, albeit only at the wide-angle lens setting, making the S95 very well-suited to low-light, hand-held photography."
photographyblog.com | talking about the S95's iso-noise

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot S95

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.0
Size
Really small
Compact 99x58x29 mm
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor size
Large sensor
1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Light sensitivity (boost)
High ISO (boost)
12,800 ISO
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

59

"If you want a compact megazoom with manual controls, GPS, and excellent photo quality, the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS is a good place to start."
reviews.cnet.com | talking about the SX230 HS's overall-performance
"The noise and noise reduction are well balanced so you still get very good color and detail at these higher sensitivities."
reviews.cnet.com | talking about the SX230 HS's iso-noise

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second

differences

Advantages of the Canon SX230 HS

Zoom Significantly more zoom 14x vs 3.8x
Help
Around 14x more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 24fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video at a higher frame rate
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies 240 fps vs None
Help
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor CMOS vs CCD
Help
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
GPS Has a GPS Yes vs No
Help
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 3.2 fps vs 1.9 fps
Help
Around 70% faster continuous shooting
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed 1/3200s vs 1/1600s
Help
2x faster max shutter speed
Lowest price Cheaper $239.00 vs $340.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $101 cheaper (around 30% less)
Battery life Slightly longer battery life 210 shots vs 200 shots
Help
Around 10% more shots per battery charge
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Learn more about
the Canon SX230 HS

Advantages of the Canon S95

Aperture Much wider aperture f/2.0 vs f/3.1
Help
At its widest zoom, the S95's lens captures much more light (1.3 f-stops)
Sensor size Much larger sensor 1/1.7" 7.6x5.7mm vs 1/2.3" 6.2x4.6mm
Help
More than 50% larger sensor
Supports RAW Shoots RAW Yes vs No
Help
Digitally develop your own photos with precise image control
HDR Has in-camera HDR Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO 12,800 ISO vs None
Help
Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image
Size Smaller 99x58x29 mm vs 106x59x33 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller
Thickness Thinner 1.2" vs 1.3"
Help
More than 10% thinner
True resolution Slightly higher true resolution 10 MP vs 9.8 MP
Help
Almost the same
Weight Lighter 193 g vs 215 g
Help
More than 10% lighter
Canon PowerShot S95 Learn more about
the Canon S95
vs

recommendations

Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Canon PowerShot SX230 HS
59 vs 77
Explain scores
Canon PowerShot S95 Canon PowerShot S95
Green arrow Snapsort recommends the Canon PowerShot S95. This recommendation, however, should be taken with a grain of salt since it doesn't always make sense to compare a travel zoom with a pro digicam.

advice

Need help deciding?

Ask the community!

I am considering either the SX230 HS or the S95,
For example: Taking photos in low light or great family photos or ability to take great photos underwater

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags:

Are you a camera expert? Share your knowledge!

1
votes
by Alex-Ayala last month
Canon S95 vs Nikon P310

I am an architect and I need a canara for outdoor shooting, I use the images as a suport for my...

2
votes
by Jamie-Henry-Tinnemeyer this month
Canon SX230 HS vs Panasonic DMC-ZS10

Looking for a nice digital camera, not sure if I should go for a canon, nikon, or panasonic.  I ...

4 people recommend the Canon SX230 HS:

" Which do you recommend and why?   I think Canon makes the best P&S cameras and I'm a Nikon D..."

" I think you should have a closer look at the Canon Powershot SX230 HS. It's a good allround Came..."

0
votes
by Emily-Clark last month
Canon IXUS 220 HS vs Canon SX230 HS

I'm a beginner, but appreciate decent quality photos and videos! I love documenting all that I d...

0
votes
by Victoria-Gutierrez-Calvi-o last month
Canon SX230 HS vs Canon SX40

I like taking portraits of my kids, family vacations, filming short videos of my kids.

0
votes
by Maria-Mangiore-Kohrs this month
Canon 310 HS vs Canon S95

Somewhere in the middle.... not an expert at all but not really a beginner either... posed dance...

One person recommends the Canon 310 HS:

" Maria, I recommend the Elph 310 HS is your best selection for your criteria.  primarily because ..."

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Supports 24p Both support 24p, which is uncommon in cameras similar to these Help
For that film look
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
SX230 HS:Sensor shift, Lens
S95:Lens
Thickness Quite thick Help
SX230 HS:1.3"
S95:1.2"
Weight Heavy Help
SX230 HS:215 g
S95:193 g
Touch screen No touchscreens Help
More buttons
Size Large Help
SX230 HS:106x59x33 mm
S95:99x58x29 mm
Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
28 mm

dxomark

DXOMark

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$372 - $430

Wide angle Has a significantly wider wide angle lens
True resolution Takes much higher resolution photos
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX9v

Travel zoom

$319 - $330

Zoom Has slightly more zoom
Wide angle Has a significantly wider wide angle lens
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$299

Zoom Has much more zoom
Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Thickness Is thicker
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$146 - $179

Wide angle Has a significantly wider wide angle lens
Size Is significantly smaller
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Screen size Has a significantly smaller screen
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Travel zoom

$281 - $366

Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is slightly heavier
Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100

Travel zoom

$237 - $328

Zoom Has significantly more zoom
Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$328

Zoom Has slightly more zoom
Wide angle Has a significantly wider wide angle lens
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Thickness Is thicker

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Canon PowerShot SX240 HS

Travel zoom

$354 - $450

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
GPS No built-in GPS

Canon PowerShot S95 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Pro digicam

$325

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Much larger
Supports 24p No 24p support
Olympus XZ-1

Olympus XZ-1

Pro digicam

$499 - $500

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Sensor size Much larger sensor
Size Much larger
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$390 - $496

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Much longer battery life
Size Much larger
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Nikon Coolpix P300

Nikon Coolpix P300

Pro digicam

$299

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Sensor size Much smaller sensor
Supports 24p No 24p support

appearance

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Canon PowerShot S95
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Canon PowerShot S95
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Canon PowerShot S95

discussion

Showing 7 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (1:13 PM, July 20, 2011)
That's a tough on. My gut says go with the S95, because I think low light, manual controls, shoots in RAW, and it still can record HD video (at 720p). 
Either way you will be getting a great camera, it really depends on if you want a longer zoom.
 
Patrick (9:38 PM, July 19, 2011)
Hello,

I apologise to any photo enthusiasts as I am very much amateur in terms of knowledge and what I use a camera for.

I have only ever had Ixus cameras which I have always liked but I am looking to get better quality and more manual adjustment from a camera but still in a compact form like the Ixus cameras. I use the camera for all sorts of stuff. Nights out, holiday, album art or photography for my Music Projects and I have limited knowledge on it but do enjoy the idea of taking photography a bit more seriously in terms of night shots, scenic shots etc.

So I was wondering if someone could maybe give their advice. I'm afraid I'm very stubborn when it comes to brands in all things and I'm only looking for a canon camera.

I'm slightly in favour of the SX230 at the moment because of the high zoom, and video capabilities (meaning i can put off looking for an HD camcorder for a while)

But the S95 has better manual options, better low light quality which does appeal to me as I do like night shots and obviously going out pictures would be better. And generally better quality pictures. What I would like to know is are these plus points that much better and worth getting over the good zoom and video capabilities of the SX230.

Thank you in advance for any feedback given. 
 
gregorio (5:44 PM, June 28, 2011)
This was so helpful to me!  Thank you.
 
Avatar for Mark Thomas Gazel Mark Thomas Gazel (0:01 PM, June 06, 2011)
Very great and detailed info.
 
Rmsp (5:39 PM, April 18, 2011)
Wow, thanks for taking the time to providing your detailed impressions and thoughts. Very usefull.
 
Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (4:31 PM, April 05, 2011)
Great info Glenn!
 
GlennTaper (4:54 AM, April 01, 2011)
Having read reviews and blogs on both cameras compulsively for three weeks, by the time I made a decision, each was comfortably familiar. Every owner loves the S95; it has almost no enemies. It's tempting to go with the crowd on something like that. And I've heard so many say that 90% of what they shoot is 70mm or wider. But I'll say this about the big zooms: if ya got em, you use em! - even more so in video.
Excellent low light ability, F/2.0 aperture and remarkable IQ for a pocket-size unit are all convincing attributes of the S95, and the quality feel with intuitive controls further impress.
The SX230 delivers IQ in LL somewhat less well than the S95, but still produces brilliant results in actual practice. And further, it offers 14X optical zoom, shoots equally wide, does arguably just as well outdoors, is 1080P-equipped with optical zoom+continuous focus video, comes with GPS photo tagging, and has a few fun goodies to boot (wink shutter trigger, miniature mode, fish-eye mode, 2 levels of slo-mo video, etc). Its 1080P video results by the way are no less than striking. That big zoom and the 1080P were the clincher for me - well that and the IQ is very decent (and, it's on the upper end pocket-able, but is). If the IQ weren't impressive, it wouldn't have been a candidate in the first place.

In practice, when viewing computer screen stills or prints, most of the IQ differences between the two cameras will be virtually indistinguishable, except for those occasions where only the S95's low light results suffice (probably not too often for me). The SX230 appears to do well indoors in common ambient room lighting IMO. Should it fall short, that's what I have my old version of PS for.

Had Canon built the S95 with video optical zoom and autofocus, and equipped it with a 10X or 12X zoom, I'd have likely decided differently. The S95 does have active digital video zoom, but it really compromises the 720P video quality, and it doesn't re-focus at all during video.
Also worth mentioning, with the extra $50 saved (SX230 $350 vs. S95 $400), I got two 16gb SDHC C10 cards from Newegg.

So, a couple negatives points about the SX230; 1) eats batteries rather fast - ordered two spares, quite affordable on ebay, but they say to watch the quality. 2) In M mode (manual aperture & shutter), it limits ISO to 100 at a shutter slower than 1s. That kind of sucks, as I though about doing night skies and the like using ISO400+. Not a huge obstacle, but still.