Samsung WB750 vs Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Winner
Samsung WB750

49

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Samsung WB750

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×25 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
440 fps
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
10 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS.
Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Samsung WB750.

competitors

Samsung WB750 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$307 - $398

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$198 - $229

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Samsung WB250F

Samsung WB250F

Travel zoom

$250

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Battery life Longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Travel zoom

$300

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$198 - $229

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$419

GPS Has a GPS
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Samsung WB750
WB750
Samsung

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
PowerShot SX220 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments