Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR vs Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

41

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Size
Really small
Compact (106×59×33 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
1.3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX220 HS.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$120 - $177

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F850EXR

Travel zoom

$170

Size Slightly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$195 - $229

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

$220

GPS Has a GPS
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Canon PowerShot SX610 HS

Travel zoom

$195 - $229

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$234 - $299

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix F750 EXR
FinePix F750 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
PowerShot SX220 HS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments