Updated (September 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

57

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

35

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Size
Really small
Compact (103×60×33 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
218 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Pro digicam

$998 - $1,050

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Focus points Many more focus points
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$565

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$525

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Lowest price More expensive
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$499 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Canon PowerShot SX710 HS

Travel zoom

$269 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Significantly larger

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7
Lumix DMC-ZS7
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments