Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28

30

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28

Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$447 - $448 body only

$529 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Much better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$379

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$391 - $529

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Much better image quality
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Super zoom

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Leica M10

Leica M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$6,895 - $7,995 body only

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen size Much larger screen
Built-in flash No built-in flash

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28
Lumix DMC-FZ28
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments