Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

55

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps
Focus points
Many focus points
23
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$354

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$576

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$280

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

GPS Has a GPS
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Panasonic Lumix ZS25

Travel zoom

$239

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
Lumix ZS15
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments