Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$410

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$730

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Much more zoom
Size Significantly larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$249 - $289

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Travel zoom

$350

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
Lumix ZS15
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments