Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix TS4

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TS4

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Battery life
Great battery life
310 shots
Focus points
Many focus points
23

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$329 - $349

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$320

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Waterproof

$230

Screen size Much larger screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$300 - $349

Aperture Much wider aperture
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS6

Waterproof

$200

Screen size Much larger screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
Lumix TS4
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments