Updated (January 2012): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Canon Powershot S100 vs Panasonic Lumix TS4

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

64

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (99×60×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TS4

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
Battery life
Great battery life
310 shots
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Weight
Light-weight
197 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$447 - $448 body only

$529 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Much larger
Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$379

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$391 - $529

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$118 - $148

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Significantly smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Waterproof

$560

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Waterproof

$341

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4
Lumix TS4
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments