Advantages of the Canon S100 |
 Report a correction
|
 |
|
Much better image quality |
50.0 |
vs |
34.0 |
|
Around 50% better image quality |
|
|
 |
|
Supports 24p |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Get that real film feel |
|
|
 |
|
More dynamic range |
11.6 EV |
vs |
10.4 EV |
|
1.2 f-stops more dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution movies |
1080p @ 24fps |
vs |
720p @ 30fps |
|
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video but at a lower frame rate |
|
|
 |
|
Better wide angle |
24 mm |
vs |
28 mm |
|
More than 10% better wide angle |
|
|
 |
|
Better color depth |
20.7 bits |
vs |
18.8 bits |
|
Distinguishes 1.9 more bits of color |
|
|
 |
|
Has a CMOS-family sensor |
CMOS |
vs |
CCD |
|
CMOS-family sensors often produce better quality images |
|
|
 |
|
Has in-camera HDR |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Combines multiple exposures to capture high dynamic range |
|
|
 |
|
Records high-speed movies |
240 fps |
vs |
None |
|
Capture events too fast for the naked eye and play them back in super-slow motion |
|
|
 |
|
Has a GPS |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Automatically geotags your photos when traveling |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly higher true resolution |
12 MP |
vs |
10 MP |
|
Capture more than 20% more detail in your photos |
|
|
 |
|
Better image stabilization |
Lens |
vs |
Sensor shift |
|
Less risk of blur |
|
|
 |
|
Has boost ISO |
12,800 ISO |
vs |
None |
|
Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly lower noise at high ISO |
153 ISO |
vs |
117 ISO |
|
The S100 has a slight edge (0.4 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance |
|
|
 |
|
Smaller |
99x60x28 mm |
vs |
110x64x42 mm |
|
Around 50% smaller |
|
|
 |
|
Shoots faster |
9.6 fps |
vs |
7 fps |
|
Around 40% faster continuous shooting |
|
|
|
|
Thinner |
1.1" |
vs |
1.7" |
|
More than 30% thinner |
|
|
 |
|
Lighter |
198 g |
vs |
275 g |
|
Around 30% lighter |
|
|
|
|
|
Advantages of the Olympus XZ-1 |
Report a correction
|
 |
|
Has an OLED screen |
OLED |
vs |
LCD |
|
OLED screens are often brighter and more vibrant than typical LCD screens |
|
|
|
|
Larger sensor |
1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm |
vs |
1/1.8" 7.5x5.5mm |
|
More than 20% larger sensor |
|
|
 |
|
Can create panoramas in-camera |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective |
|
|
 |
|
Wider aperture |
f/1.8 |
vs |
f/2.0 |
|
At its widest zoom, the XZ-1's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops) |
|
|
 |
|
Higher resolution screen |
614k dots |
vs |
461k dots |
|
More than 30% higher resolution screen |
|
|
 |
|
Longer battery life |
320 shots |
vs |
200 shots |
|
60% more shots per battery charge |
|
|
 |
|
Better macro capability |
1 cm |
vs |
3 cm |
|
Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens |
|
|
 |
|
Supports an external flash |
Yes |
vs |
No |
|
An external flash often produces better looking flash images |
|
|
 |
|
Significantly longer exposures |
60s |
vs |
15s |
|
4x longer exposures |
|
|
 |
|
Slightly cheaper |
$229.99 |
vs |
$280.00 |
|
The best price we've seen is $50 cheaper (around 20% less) |
|
|
|
|
|
Snapsort Recommends
Report a correction
Showing 0 comments