Updated (September 2011): Compare the Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix P7000

Canon Powershot S100 vs Nikon Coolpix P7000

Winner
Canon Powershot S100

45

Nikon Coolpix P7000

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Canon Powershot S100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7000

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Battery life
Great battery life
350 shots
Macro focus
Great macro
2.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon Powershot S100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7000.

competitors

Canon Powershot S100 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$330

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Low light performance Lower noise at high ISO
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Canon PowerShot S120

Canon PowerShot S120

Pro digicam

$600

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix P7000 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7100

Nikon Coolpix P7100

Pro digicam

$325

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pro digicam

$420

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Overall image quality Much better image quality
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm Finepix X10

Fujifilm Finepix X10

Pro digicam

$449

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Canon Powershot S100
Powershot S100
Canon

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P7000
Coolpix P7000
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments